4.6 Article

Human corpus luteum physiology and the luteal-phase dysfunction associated with ovarian stimulation

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 S19-S24

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60444-0

关键词

corpus luteum; luteal phase; luteinizing hormone; ovarian stimulation; steroidogenic acute regulatory protein

资金

  1. Chilean Research Council (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnologicas FONDAP) [15010006]
  2. Fogarty International Research Collaboration Award
  3. National Institute of Health [RFATW-05-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human corpus luteum is a temporary endocrine gland that develops after ovulation from the ruptured follicle during the luteal phase. It is an important contributor of steroid hormones, particularly progesterone, and is critical for the maintenance of early pregnancy. Luteal-phase dysfunction can result in premature regression of the gland, with a subsequent shift to an infertile cycle. Understanding the mechanism of steroidogenesis during corpus luteum growth and regression is crucial for evaluating the normal physiology and pathophysiology of reproductive cycles. The rate-limiting step in corpus luteum steroidogenesis is the transport of cholesterol to the site of steroid production. Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein is a key player in this process and is positively correlated with progesterone concentrations throughout the early and mid-luteal phase. Changes in the endocrine environment brought on by the gonadotrophins used for ovarian stimulation are thought to underlie the corpus luteum dysfunction associated with IVF cycles. While ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is associated with human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), studies suggest that exogenous progesterone provides necessary luteal support in patients undergoing IVF. The current trend towards simple stimulation protocols and the use of single-embryo transfers provide further opportunity to revisit HCG administration as luteal support.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据