4.6 Article

The histidine-rich glycoprotein A1042G polymorphism and recurrent miscarriage: a pilot study

期刊

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-70

关键词

Histidine-rich glycoprotein; Recurrent miscarriage; Single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. Swedish Society of Medicine
  2. Family Planning Foundation in Uppsala, Sweden
  3. Uppsala-Orebro Regional Research Council, Sweden
  4. Centrum for Clinical Research in Varmland, Sweden
  5. Stiftelsen Olle Engkvist Byggm stare, Stockholm, Sweden
  6. Swedish Research Council [D0277902, D0277901]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Histidine-rich Glycoprotein (HRG) has previously been shown to have an impact on implantation and fertility. The aim of this study was to investigate if there is an association between the HRG A1042G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and recurrent miscarriage. Methods: The study was designed as a case-control study and the women were included at University Hospitals in Sweden. 186 cases with recurrent miscarriage were compared with 380 pregnant controls with no history of miscarriage. Each woman was genotyped for the HRG A1042G SNP. Results: The results indicated that the frequency of heterozygous HRG A1042G carriers was higher among controls compared to cases (34.7% vs 26.3%; p < 0.05). In a bivariate regression analysis, a negative association was found between recurrent miscarriage and heterozygous A/G carriers both in the entire study population (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 - 0.99; p < 0.05) as well as in a subgroup of women with primary recurrent miscarriage (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.16 - 0.84; p < 0.05). These results remained even after adjustment for known confounders such as age, BMI and thyroid disease (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15 - 0.84; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Women who are heterozygous carriers of the HRG A1042G SNP suffer from recurrent miscarriage more seldom than homozygous carriers. Thus, analysis of the HRG A1042G SNP might be of importance for individual counseling regarding miscarriage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据