4.3 Article

Embryo development and sex ratio of in vitro-produced porcine embryos are affected by the energy substrate and hyaluronic acid added to the culture medium

期刊

REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 570-577

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/RD13004

关键词

blastocyst, glucose, hyaluronan, pig, pyruvate-lactate.

资金

  1. Autonomous Government of Catalonia [2009 SGR 745]
  2. Spanish Government [RZ2011-00001-00-00]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport [FPU: AP2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the effects of replacing glucose with pyruvate-lactate and supplementing these in vitro culture (IVC) media with hyaluronic acid (HA) on porcine embryo development and sex ratio were examined. The in vitro-produced (IVP) porcine embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 medium with 0.0, 0.5 or 1.0 mg mL(-1) HA, and with either 5.55 mM glucose (IVC-Glu) or pyruvate (0.17 mM)-lactate (2.73 mM) from 0 to 48 h post insemination (h.p.i.) and then with glucose from 48 to 168 h.p.i. (IVC-PL). Those embryos cultured with IVC-PL had significantly higher blastocyst rates (23.7 +/- 1.5%) than those cultured with IVC-Glu (14.27 +/- 2.75%). At 1.0 mg mL(-1), HA tended to skew the sex ratio of blastocysts towards males in those embryos cultured in IVC-PL, and led to a significant decrease in the blastocyst rate compared with embryos cultured in the presence of 0.5 and 0.0 mg mL(-1) HA and IVC-Glu (4.28 +/- 0.28% vs 11.01 +/- 1.42% and 10.14 +/- 2.77%, respectively) and IVC-PL (14.37 +/- 1.35% vs 20.96 +/- 2.85% and 22.99 +/- 1.39%, respectively). In contrast, there were no significant differences in the total cell number per blastocyst or in apoptosis rates. In conclusion, pyruvate and lactate were the preferred energy substrates in the early stages of IVP porcine embryos. Moreover, 1.0 mg mL(-1) HA significantly decreased the percentage of blastocyst rates in both the IVC-Glu and IVC-PL groups, but only by a preferential loss of female embryos for those cultured in IVC-PL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据