4.7 Review

Bosons in high-temperature superconductors: an experimental survey

期刊

REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/74/6/066501

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council
  2. Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRFK) [20100008552]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2010-0008552] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We review a number of experimental techniques that are beginning to reveal fine details of the bosonic spectrum alpha F-2(Omega) that dominates the interaction between the quasiparticles in high-temperature superconductors. Angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) shows kinks in electronic dispersion curves at characteristic energies that agree with similar structures in the optical conductivity and tunnelling spectra. Each technique has its advantages. ARPES is momentum resolved and offers independent measurements of the real and imaginary part of the contribution of the bosons to the self-energy of the quasiparticles. The optical conductivity can be used on a larger variety of materials and with the use of maximum entropy techniques reveals rich details of the spectra including their evolution with temperature and doping. Scanning tunnelling spectroscopy offers spatial resolution on the unit cell level. We find that together the various spectroscopies, including recent Raman results, are pointing to a unified picture of a broad spectrum of bosonic excitations at high temperatures which evolves, as the temperature is lowered, into a peak in the 30-60 meV region and a featureless high-frequency background in most of the materials studied. This behaviour is consistent with the spectrum of spin fluctuations as measured by magnetic neutron scattering. However, there is evidence for a phonon contribution to the bosonic spectrum as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据