4.7 Article

The economy-wide effects of large-scale renewable electricity expansion in Europe: The role of integration costs

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 1369-1380

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.09.052

关键词

VRE expansion; Integration costs; Macroeconomic effects; Wind; Photovoltaics; Computable general equilibrium

资金

  1. EU Research and Innovation Framework Program Horizon 2020 [642242]
  2. government of Styria (Amt der Steiermarkischen Landesregierung, Referat Wissenschaft and Forschung)
  3. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [642242] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing share of renewables in electricity generation in Europe, implied economy-wide macroeconomic feedbacks and spill-over effects to other sectors and actors are of rising importance. We quantify the macroeconomic effects of a large-scale expansion of wind and photovoltaics (PV) in Europe, employing a global multi-regional multi-sectoral computable general equilibrium (CGE) model. We place special emphasis on electricity market integration costs, which have so far been neglected not only in most bottom-up technology comparisons, but also in macroeconomic studies. We find that the societal welfare effects of a large-scale expansion of wind and PV tend to be positive; however, when integration costs are taken into account, positive welfare effects are either much smaller or even become negative, depending very much on regional characteristics, such as the prevailing electricity mix, weighted average costs of capital (WACC) or capacity factors. We also show that macroeconomic feedback effects raise generation costs above what is anticipated from a bottom-up perspective, since the high capital intensities of renewable electricity generation technologies drive up economy-wide capital prices. This may imply that they are no longer competitive when installed at large-scales. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据