4.7 Article

Distributed generation: The definitive boost for renewable energy in Spain

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 354-364

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.010

关键词

Distributed generation; Renewable energy; Self-supply; Virtual power plant; Smart grid; Active grid management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

European efforts to fight climate change, to improve the security of energy supply, and to drive innovation and competitiveness in the next decade will make distributed generation (DG) develop and grow considerably. DG growth is an integral component of a new vision of an effective and highly responsive European Smart Grid in which the actions of all stakeholders are fully integrated. According to IMPROGRES (Improvement of the Social Optimal Outcome of Market Integration of Distributed Generation (DG) and renewable energy resources (RES) in European Electricity Markets), DG/RES electricity generation in the EU-27 will increase from 490 TWh/year in 2005 to approximately 1280 TWh/year in 2030. The relative proportion to the total electricity generated will also grow from 15% to approximately 26% during the same time period. However, there are a number of existing barriers that prevent the spread of DG in the European market. These barriers range from simple commercial issues, such as the fact that the energy produced is currently not cost-effective in comparison to the electricity generated on a large scale, to complex regulatory reforms. In Spain, these barriers are being overcome, grid parity is almost certain, and regulatory reform is on track to become a reality. In this article, several comparisons are made regarding different solutions already adopted in European countries for low power distributed generation, thereby providing possible solutions to the budding energy situation in Spain, as well as an overview of trends and growth forecasts for distributed generation and smart grid (SG) projects. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据