4.8 Review

Analysing the South African residential sector's energy profile

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 240-252

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.052

关键词

Residential sector; Energy consumption; Energy habits; South Africa; NIDS

资金

  1. South African National Research Foundation (NRF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Given the significance of the residential sector in terms of energy consumption, a comprehensive understanding of households' energy consumption patterns and choices is imperative. This paper focuses on analysing and understanding the South African residential sector's energy characteristics considering their energy-use profile, and other characteristics such as their geographical distribution and demographic characteristics. The findings show that despite poorer households who are connected to the national grid receiving 50 kW/h of free electricity per month to help them cover their basis energy needs, South African households - particularly low-income households - still use various sources of energy including wood and paraffin to satisfy their basic energy requirements. Solid fuels are predominantly used in rural areas where around 75% of non-electrified households rely on solid fuels for cooking, heating and lighting. Low-income South African households consume between 5% and 10% of their total energy in lighting; space heating and cooking account for the remainder 85-90% of their total energy consumption. After evaluating the relevant data regarding households' access to electricity, the type of energy used by households and households' expenditure on electricity and energy in South Africa from the NIDS dataset; it was concluded, that electricity access is reasonably high across South African households. Additionally, an increasing trend can be observed in their total expenditure on electricity. However, approximately 70% of households still spend on other energy sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据