4.8 Review

A review of the mathematical models for predicting the heating value of biomass materials

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 3065-3083

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.054

关键词

Higher heating value; Biomass; Renewable energy; Proximal analysis; Elemental analysis

资金

  1. Proyecto de Investigacion of the University of Almeria [C400860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following the discovery of fire, biomass became the main source of energy used by mankind. Advanced societies have largely replaced the use of biomass with the use of fossil fuels, but our dependence on these ever scarcer resources, plus the need to reduce CO2 emissions in the face of climate change, is forcing us to make use of renewable sources of energy, including biomass. The exploitation of this resource often requires that its heating value be known. This can be determined either directly (though not cheaply) or by the use of models that predict it using a number of easily and economically determined variables. The present review gathers together the most recent models for predicting the heating value of biomass, assesses their areas of application, and highlights errors that have been made in their formulation, transcription, and in the references made to them. Different models have relied upon elemental, proximal, structural, physical and chemical analyses to determine the values of necessary variables, although those relying on the results of the first two types of analysis have been the most popular. The simplest models and those with the widest range of applications are those most often referred to in the literature. The frequency with which important information has been left unconsidered in some studies, which has led to errors in the expressions presented, as well as errors of transcription and referencing, suggest that future work should be undertaken with greater diligence. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据