4.7 Article

Influence of different treatment modalities on survival of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma: A retrospective cohort study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 147-151

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.072

关键词

Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma; Prognosis; Treatment; Lymphadenectomy; Ovarian preservation

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81402527]
  2. Sci-Tech Office of Guangdong Province [2013B021800157]
  3. Youth Foundation of Fujian Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission [2014-2-63]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province [2015J01550]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: To assess the efficacy of different treatment modalities on the outcome of patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS). Methods: Patients with LG-ESS who received hysterectomy from March 1991 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. The associations between clinicopathologic variables and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated. Results: One hundred and fourteen patients met the eligibility requirements. All patients received hysterectomy as the main treatment, 17.5% (20/114) of patients received ovarian preservation, and 62.3% (71/114) of patients received lymphadenectomy. Fifty-six patients received chemotherapy, 36 patients received radiotherapy, and 11 patients received endocrine therapy. The median follow-up duration was 40 months. The 5-year and 10-year DFS rates were 91.8% and 77.4%, respectively. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 96.7% and 96.7%, respectively. Univariate analyses showed that there were no risk factors associated with DFS. Lymphadenectomy, lymph node status, ovarian preservation, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and endocrine therapy had no significant effect on DFS. Conclusions: Hysterectomy has been the mainstay of treatment for LG-ESS. The optimal treatment strategy in LG-ESS remains to be determined. (C) 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据