4.5 Article

AST-120 Treatment in Pre-Dialysis Period Affects the Prognosis in Patients on Hemodialysis

期刊

RENAL FAILURE
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 856-860

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08860220802356531

关键词

AST-120; oral adsorbent; chronic kidney disease; hemodialysis; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims. An oral adsorbent, AST-120, has been shown to retard the deterioration of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) by decreasing serum nephrotoxic substances such as indoxyl sulfate. Recent studies have suggested that a high level of serum indoxyl sulfate may be one of the mechanisms underlying the progression of atherosclerotic lesion, which is the leading cause of cardiovascular event or death in dialysis patients. In this study, we examined retrospectively whether AST-120 given to patients in the pre-dialysis period influences the prognosis after the initiation of dialysis. Methods. One hundred and ninety-two CKD patients on dialysis were studied. The survival and causes of death after the initiation of dialysis were compared between patients who were administrated AST-120 (AST-120 group, n = 101) and those not administrated AST-120 (non-AST-120 group, n = 91) prior to the initiation of dialysis. Results. The five-year survival rate was 72.6% in the AST-120 group and 52.6% in the non-AST-120 group, and was significantly higher in the AST-120 group (p = 0.018). The risk of death was increased 1.91-fold in the non-AST-120 group. However, no difference in the causes of death was observed between two groups. Conclusion. This study suggests that AST-120 given prior to the initiation of dialysis improves the prognosis of CKD patients under dialysis, although there is no association between AST-120 treatment and death caused by cardiovascular diseases such as heart failure, myocardial infarction, and cerebral hemorrhage. Further studies are needed to elucidate the effect of AST-120 on cardiovascular events and the prognosis in dialysis patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据