4.7 Article

The use of remote sensing-derived water surface data for hydraulic model calibration

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 149, 期 -, 页码 130-141

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2014.04.007

关键词

Hydraulic model calibration; Remote sensing; Altimetry data; ERS-2 and ENVISAT; Po river

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considering a large satellite dataset (i.e. similar to 16 years of ERS-2 and ENVISAT observations) we investigate the reliability of remotely-sensed data for calibrating a quasi-two dimensional (quasi-2D) hydraulic model of a similar to 140 km reach of the middle-lower portion of the Po river (Northern Italy), for which detailed topographical information and in-situ hydrometric data are available. In particular, we refer to traditional and remotelysensed hydrometric data for: 1) evaluating if ERS-2 and ENVISAT data can be used for model calibration; 2) assessing whether remotely-sensed water elevation data can integrate traditional hydrometric data and improve the reliability of the hydraulic model. Satellite overpasses are generally characterized by low frequencies and the accuracy of remotely-sensed water surface levels is still limited. Nevertheless, the results of our analysis indicate that for medium-to-large rivers ERS-2 and ENVISAT satellite data can effectively enhance our knowledge of the average streamflow regime of a given reach: they can be directly used in calibration, and their integration with in-situ data may significantly enhance the representation of the hydraulic behaviour of the study river. Considering our study reach, if compared to the model implemented on the basis of in-situ data only the hydraulic model parameterized on the basis of satellite and in-situ hydrometric data provides a better reproduction of average flow conditions, and it also results in the most accurate representation of the maximum water profile observed during a major flood occurred in October 2000. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据