4.7 Article

Monitoring spruce volume and biomass with InSAR data from TanDEM-X

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 60-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.036

关键词

InSAR; Forest inventory; Volume; Biomass; Nonlinear mixed models

资金

  1. European Space Agency through PRODEX
  2. Norwegian Research Council through the Development fund for forestry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a need for monitoring methods for forest volume, biomass and carbon based on satellite remote sensing. In the present study we tested interferometric X-band SAR (InSAR) from the Tandem-X mission. The aim of the study was to describe how accurate volume and biomass could be estimated from InSAR height and test whether the relationships were curvilinear or not. The study area was a spruce dominated forest in southeast Norway. We selected 28 stands in which we established 192 circular sample plots of 250 m(2), accurately positioned by a Differential Global Positioning System (dGPS). Plot level data on stem volume and aboveground biomass were derived from field inventory. Stem volume ranged from zero to 596 m(3)/ha, and aboveground biomass up to 338 t/ha. We generated 2 Digital Surface Models (DSMs) from InSAR processing of two co-registered, HH-polarized TanDEM-X image pairs - one ascending and one descending pair. We used a Digital Terrain Model (DTM) from airborne laser scanning (ALS) as a reference and derived a 10 m x 10 m Canopy Height Model (CHM), or InSAR height model. We assigned each plot to the nearest 10 m x 10 m InSAR height pixel. We applied a nonlinear, mixed model for the volume and biomass modeling, and from a full model we removed effects with a backward stepwise approach. InSAR height was proportional to volume and aboveground biomass, where a 1 m increase in InSAR height corresponded to a volume increase of 23 m(3)/ha and a biomass increase of 14 t/ha. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values were 43-44% at the plot level and 19-20% at the stand level. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据