4.7 Article

Capability of the Sentinel 2 mission for tropical coral reef mapping and coral bleaching detection

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 120, 期 -, 页码 145-155

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.028

关键词

Sentinel 2; Coral reef; Uncertainty; Mapping; Bleaching

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0663]
  2. World Bank
  3. Global Environments Facility
  4. University of Queensland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Sentinel 2 mission offers continuity of service for the moderate resolution multispectral SPOT XS and Landsat Thematic Mapper series sensors, but also offers several design improvements that may lead to enhanced capability in coral reef mapping applications. In this study modeling and simulated image analyses were conducted to evaluate the relative capability of the Sentinel 2 instrument design compared to SPOT-4 and Landsat ETM+, for mapping bathymetry and benthic composition, and for coral bleaching detection. The analyses involved propagating noise and environmental uncertainties through a radiative transfer model inversion to quantify uncertainty in retrievable parameters from each sensor. The experiment structure included factors for sensor-environmental noise, band choice, and complexity of benthic reflectance model. Results indicate that while variables related to reef 'health' such as coral mortality and algal cover cannot be mapped accurately by this class of instrument; Sentinel 2 does have improved ability for discrimination of reef benthic composition over SPOT-4 and Landsat ETM+. The key enabling design factors are the narrowness of bands, increased spatial resolution and additional band at 443 nm; instrument noise was a less significant factor. Rapid revisit times, global coverage, and freely available data suggest the potential for time series analyses. Sentinel 2 may also be capable of bleaching detection by change analysis given effective methods for precise cross-image image radiometric and spatial alignment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据