4.7 Article

An intercomparison of bio-optical techniques for detecting dominant phytoplankton size class from satellite remote sensing

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 115, 期 2, 页码 325-339

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.09.004

关键词

Phytoplankton; Size; Ocean colour; Remote sensing; Pigment; Chlorophyll-a; SeaWiFS; Absorption

资金

  1. National Environmental Research Council, UK
  2. National Centre for Earth Observation
  3. NERC
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  5. NERC [SAH01001, pml010008, earth010003] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [SAH01001, pml010008, earth010003] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite remote sensing of ocean colour is the only method currently available for synoptically measuring wide-area properties of ocean ecosystems, such as phytoplankton chlorophyll biomass. Recently, a variety of bio-optical and ecological methods have been established that use satellite data to identify and differentiate between either phytoplankton functional types (PFTs) or phytoplankton size classes (PSCs). In this study, several of these techniques were evaluated against in situ observations to determine their ability to detect dominant phytoplankton size classes (micro-, nano- and picoplankton). The techniques are applied to a 10-year ocean-colour data series from the SeaWiFS satellite sensor and compared with in situ data (6504 samples) from a variety of locations in the global ocean. Results show that spectral-response, ecological and abundance-based approaches can all perform with similar accuracy. Detection of microplankton and picoplankton were generally better than detection of nanoplankton. Abundance-based approaches were shown to provide better spatial retrieval of PSCs. Individual model performance varied according to PSC, input satellite data sources and in situ validation data types. Uncertainty in the comparison procedure and data sources was considered. Improved availability of in situ observations would aid ongoing research in this field. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据