4.7 Article

Monitoring lake level changes on the Tibetan Plateau using ICESat altimetry data (2003-2009)

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 115, 期 7, 页码 1733-1742

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.03.005

关键词

Tibetan Plateau; Lake level; ICESat; Salt lake; Glacier melting

资金

  1. U.S. NASA [NNX08AQ87G]
  2. State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Nuclear Resources and Environment at East China Institute of Technology [101110]
  3. China Scholarship Council, University of Texas at San Antonio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study. ICESat altimetry data are used to provide precise lake elevations of the Tibetan Plateau (IF) during the period of 2003-2009. Among the 261 lakes examined ICESat data are available on 111 lakes: 74 lakes with ICESat footprints for 4-7 years and 37 lakes with footprints for 1-3 years. This is the first time that precise lake elevation data are provided for the 111 lakes. Those ICESat elevation data can be used as baselines for future changes in lake levels as well as for changes during the 2003-2009 period. It is found that in the 74 lakes (56 salt lakes) examined, 62 (i.e. 84%) of all lakes and 50 (i.e. 89%) of the salt lakes show tendency of lake level increase. The mean lake water level increase rate is 0.23 m/year for the 56 salt lakes and 0.27 m/year for the 50 salt lakes of water level increase. The largest lake level increase rate (0.80 m/year) found in this study is the lake Cedo Caka. The 74 lakes are grouped into four subareas based on geographical locations and change tendencies in lake levels. Three of the four subareas show increased lake levels. The mean lake level change rates for subareas I, II, III, IV, and the entire TP are 0.12, 0.26, 0.19, -0.11, and 0.2 m/year, respectively. These recent increases in lake level, particularly for a high percentage of salt lakes, supports accelerated glacier melting due to global warming as the most likely cause. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据