4.7 Article

Bone mineral density and body composition after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in men: A short-term longitudinal study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 101-107

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.048

关键词

Body composition; Bone mineral density; Obesity; Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy; Weight loss

类别

资金

  1. CR Ministry of Education via University of Ostrava [SGS20LFOU2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Longitudinal changes in bone and body composition occurring in obese men after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been evaluated. Methods: In short-term longitudinal study, 25 obese men in mean baseline age 44.8 +/- 10.9 years and mean body mass index (BMI) 43.3 +/- 4.4 kg/m(2) were assessed after undergoing LSG for obesity. Bone mineral density (BMD) (spine, femoral neck [FN], total hip [TH], and total body [TB]) and body composition (TB bone mineral content [BMC], fat, % of fat, lean, lean BMC, total mass) were assessed at baseline, and after three and six months. Results: Mean body measurements, including weight, BMI, waist and hips, decreased significantly over the study period (p < 0.0001). FN BMD (p < 0.01) and TH BMD (p < 0.001) decreased, and spine BMD increased significantly (p < 0.001). TB BMD did not change. Weight decreased by 21.3 +/- 7.3%, BMI by 21.2 +/- 7.3%, FN BMD by 3.32 +/- 6.35%, TH BMD by 3.51 +/- 3.95% whereas spine BMD increased by 2.89 +/- 5.1%. TB BMC increased by 2.4 +/- 4.62%; all other variables relating to body composition decreased: fat by 33.0 +/- 9.6%, lean mass by 12.8 +/- 6.1%, lean BMC by 12.3 +/- 5.9%, total mass by 20.1 +/- 6.4%, and % fat by 15.8 +/- 7.2%. Conclusions: After LSG, body size and variables related to body composition (except for TB BMC) decreased with an accompanying decrease in FN BMD in the men in this study. Spine BMD increased, and TB BMD did not change. (C) 2015 IJS Publishing Group Limited. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据