4.7 Article

A threshold insensitive method for locating the forest canopy top with waveform lidar

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 115, 期 12, 页码 3286-3297

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.012

关键词

Lidar; Signal start; Tree height; Waveform; Noise

资金

  1. NCEOI (Natural environment research council Centre for Earth Observation and Instrumentation) through the Centre for Terrestrial Carbon Dynamics (CTCD) [SA-014-DJ-2007]
  2. EPSRC [GR/9054658]
  3. NERC [earth010003] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. STFC [ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [earth010003] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H00260X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lidars have the unique ability to make direct, physical measurements of forest height and vertical structure in much denser canopies than is possible with passive optical or short wavelength radars. However the literature reports a consistent underestimate of tree height when using physically based methods, necessitating empirical corrections. This bias is a result of overestimating the range to the canopy top due to background noise and failing to correctly identify the ground. This paper introduces a method, referred to as noise tracking, to avoid biases when determining the range to the canopy top. Simulated waveforms, created with Monte-Carlo ray tracing over geometrically explicit forest models, are used to test noise tracking against simple thresholding over a range of forest and system characteristics. It was found that noise tracking almost completely removed the bias in all situations except for very high noise levels and very low (<10%) canopy covers. In all cases noise tracking gave lower errors than simple thresholding and had a lower sensitivity to the initial noise threshold. Finite laser pulses spread out the measured signal, potentially overriding the benefit of noise tracking. In the past laser pulse length has been corrected by adding half that length to the signal start range. This investigation suggests that this is not always appropriate for simple thresholding and that the results for noise tracking were more directly related to pulse length than for simple thresholding. That this effect has not been commented on before may be due to the possible confounding impacts of instrument and survey characteristics inherent in field data. This method should help improve the accuracy of waveform lidar measurements of forests, whether using airborne or spaceborne instruments. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据