4.7 Article

Topographically based spatially averaging of SAR data improves performance of soil moisture models

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 115, 期 12, 页码 3507-3516

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.013

关键词

Remote sensing; Topography; Soil moisture; Synthetic aperture radar; RADARSAT-1; LiDAR; Prairie pothole; Canada

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Network of Centres of Excellence
  3. Ducks Unlimited Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial averaging schemes have often been used to improve empirical models that relate radar backscatter coefficient to soil moisture. However, reducing the noise in backscatter response not related to soil moisture often results in signal losses that are related to soil moisture. In this study we tested whether a spatial averaging scheme based on topographic features improved regressions relating backscatter coefficient and soil moisture on the low relief landscape of the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada. Soil moisture data were collected along hillslope transects within pothole drainage basins at intervals coincident with RADARSAT-1 satellite overpass. Spatial averaging schemes were designed at four scales: pixel, topographic feature (uplands, side-slopes, and lowlands), pothole drainage basin, and landscape (0.8 km x 1.6 km). The relationship between soil moisture and backscatter coefficient improved with increasing area of spatial averaging from a pixel (R-2=0.18, P<0.005), to the pothole drainage basin (R-2=0.36, P<0.005), to the landscape (R-2=0.66, P<0.005). However, the strongest relationship (R-2=0.72, P<0.005) was obtained by spatially averaging radar images based on topographic features. These findings indicate that topographically based spatial averaging of RADARSAT-1 imagery improves empirical models that are created to map the complex patterns of soil moisture in prairie pothole landscapes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据