4.7 Article

Alternate spatial sampling approaches for ecosystem structure inventory using spaceborne lidar

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 115, 期 6, 页码 1361-1368

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.01.016

关键词

Lidar; Remote sensing; Laser altimetry; DESDynl; Flash lidar

资金

  1. NASA [NNX08AN37G]
  2. NASA [NNX08AN37G, 96284] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of spaceborne lidar data to mapping of ecosystem structure is currently limited by the relatively small fraction of the earth's surface sampled by these sensors; this limitation is likely to remain over the next generation of lidar missions. Currently planned lidar missions will collect transects of data with contiguous observations along each transect: transects will be spread over swaths of multiple kilometers, a sampling pattern that results in high sampling density along track and low sampling density across track. In this work we demonstrate the advantages of a hybrid spatial sampling approach that combines a single conventional transect with a systematic grid of observations. We compare this hybrid approach to traditional lidar sampling that distributes the same number of observations into five transects. We demonstrate that a hybrid sampling approach achieves benchmarks for the spatial distribution of observations in approximately 1/3 of the time required for transect sampling and results in estimates of ecosystem height that have half the uncertainty as those from transect sampling. This type of approach is made possible by a suite of technologies, known together as Electronically Steerable Flash Lidar. A spaceborne sensor with the flexibility of this technology would produce estimates of ecosystem structure that are more reliable and spatially complete than a similar number of observations collected in transects and should be considered for future lidar remote sensing missions. (C) 2011 Elsevier inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据