4.7 Article

Calibration and validation of hyperspectral indices for the estimation of broadleaved forest leaf chlorophyll content, leaf mass per area, leaf area index and leaf canopy biomass

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 112, 期 10, 页码 3846-3864

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.06.005

关键词

chlorophyll; LMA; SLA; leaf biomass; EO1 hyperion; ASD fieldspec; LAI; PROSPECT; SAIL; PROSAIL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article aims at finding efficient hyperspectral indices for the estimation of forest sun leaf chlorophyll content (CHL, mu g cm(leaf)(-2)), sun leaf mass per area (LMA, g(dry) (matter) m(leaf)(-2)), canopy leaf area index (LAI, m(leaf)(2) m(soil)(-2)) and leaf canopy biomass (B-leaf, g(dry) (matter) m(soil)(-2)). These parameters are useful inputs for forest ecosystem simulations at landscape scale. The method is based on the determination of the best vegetation indices (index form and wavelengths) using the radiative transfer model PROSAIL (formed by the newly-calibrated leaf reflectance model PROSPECT coupled with the multi-layer version of the canopy radiative transfer model SAIL). The results are tested on experimental measurements at both leaf and canopy scales. At the leaf scale, it is possible to estimate CHL with high precision using a two wavelength vegetation index after a simulation based calibration. At the leaf scale, the LMA is more difficult to estimate with indices. At the canopy scale, efficient indices were determined on a generic simulated database to estimate CHL, LMA, LAI and Bleaf in a general way. These indices were then applied to two Hyperion images (50 plots) on the Fontainebleau and Fougeres forests and portable spectroradiometer measurements. They showed good results with an RMSE of 8.2 mu g cm(-2) for CHL, 9.1 g m(-2) for LMA, 1.7 m(2) m(-2) for LAI and 50.6 g m(-2) for Bleaf. However, at the canopy scale, even if the wavelengths of the calibrated indices were accurately determined with the simulated database, the regressions between the indices and the biophysical characteristics still had to be calibrated on measurements. At the canopy scale, the best indices were: for leaf chlorophyll content: NDchl (rho(925)-rho(710))/(rho(925)+rho(710)), for leafmass per area: NDLMA = (rho(2260)-rho(1490))/(rho(2260)+rho(1490)), for leaf area index: DLAI=rho(1725)-rho(970), and for canopy leaf biomass: NDBleaf = (rho(2160)-rho(1540))/(rho(2160)+rho(1540)). (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据