4.4 Article

Assessment of haematological and clinical pathology effects of blood microsampling in suckling and weaned juvenile rats

期刊

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 69, 期 3, 页码 425-433

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.006

关键词

Microsampling; Pups; Juvenile; Weaned; Suckling; Haematology; Clinical chemistry; Clinical pathology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tail vein microsampling in juvenile rats for toxicokinetic assessment has the potential to significantly reduce satellite animal use. This paper explores the toxicological consequences of microsampling at various post natal day (PND) ages. Methods: Microsamples were taken as follows: suckling pups, 10 pups/sex, 3 x 32 mu L samples on PND19, euthanased PND20; weaned pups, 10 pups/sex, 6 x 32 mu L samples on PND23 and PND37, euthanased PND38; and satellite pups, 3 pups/sex, 5 x 32 mu L samples on PND14 and PND35, euthanased on PND36. At termination on PND20 or PND38, clinical pathology samples were obtained and spleen, liver and bone marrow were examined. There were 10 unsampled concurrent control animals for each experiment. Results: Suckling animals: females showed a slight, statistically significant decrease in red blood cell count (0.94x of control; p < 0.05) with slight decreases in haemoglobin and haematocrit. The suckling males showed a slight increase in reticulocyte counts (1.05x of control) plus a statistically significant, slight increase in relative splenic weight. Weanling animals: the only effect was decreased liver weight in the microsampled females. In both suckling and weanling experiments, all clinical pathology values were within the age control range. In the satellite pups microsampled on PND14, there was a statistically significant transient increase in bodyweight gain between PND17 and PND21. Conclusion: The nature of the toxicological effects of microsampling was as expected. The magnitude of effects does not preclude microsampling main test pups provided care is taken over study design and blood volume loss. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据