4.4 Review

Identifying important life stages for monitoring and assessing risks from exposures to environmental contaminants: Results of a World Health Organization review

期刊

REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
卷 69, 期 1, 页码 113-124

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.09.008

关键词

Risk assessment; Harmonized early life age groups; Childhood life stages; Windows of exposure; Windows of susceptibility; Cultural and geographic modifying factors; Developmental changes in children; Exposure to environmental contaminants; Exposure factors

资金

  1. World Health Organization [001] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we summarize exposure-related issues to consider in determining the most appropriate age ranges and life stages for risk assessment. We then propose a harmonized set of age bins for monitoring and assessing risks from exposures to chemicals for global use. The focus is on preconception through adolescence, though the approach should be applicable to additional life stages. A two-tiered set of early life age groups is recommended. The first tier involves the adoption of guidance similar to the childhood age groups recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, whereas the second tier consolidates some of those age groups to reduce the burden of developing age-specific exposure factors for different regions. While there is no single correct means of choosing a common set of age groups to use internationally in assessing early life exposure and risk, use of a set of defined age groups is recommended to facilitate comparisons of potential exposures and risks around the globe, the collection of data and analyses of aggregate exposure and cumulative risk. Application of these age groups for robust assessment of exposure and risk for specific populations will require region-specific exposure factors as well as local environmental monitoring data. (C) 2013 World Health Organization. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据