3.9 Review

Opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract

期刊

REGULATORY PEPTIDES
卷 155, 期 1-3, 页码 11-17

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.regpep.2009.03.012

关键词

Alvimopan; Methylnaltrexone; Naloxone; Opioid peptides; Enteric nervous system; Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction; Constipation; Peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonists; Prokinetic effects

资金

  1. FWF-The Austrian Scientific Research Funds
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research
  3. Zukunftsfonds Steiermark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opium is arguably one of the oldest herbal medicines, being used as analgesic, sedative and antidiarrheal drug for thousands of years. These effects mirror the actions of the endogenous opioid system and are mediated by the principal mu, kappa- and delta-opioid receptors. In the gut, met-enkephalin, leu-enkephalin beta-endorphin and dynorphin occur in both neurons and endocrine cells. When released, opioid peptides activate opioid receptors on the enteric circuitry controlling motility and secretion. As a result, inhibition of gastric emptying, increase in sphincter tone, induction of stationary motor patterns and blockade of peristalsis ensue. Together with inhibition of ion and fluid secretion, these effects cause constipation, one of the most frequent and troublesome adverse reactions of opioid analgesic therapy. Although laxatives are most frequently used to ameliorate opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, their efficacy is unsatisfactory. Specific antagonism of peripheral opioid receptors is a more rational approach. This goal is addressed by the use of opioid receptor antagonists with limited absorption such as oral prolonged-release naloxone and opioid receptor antagonists that do not penetrate the blood-brain barrier such as methylnaltrexone and alvimopan. Preliminary evidence indicates that peripherally restricted opioid receptor antagonists may act as prokinetic drugs in their own right. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据