3.9 Article

Selective effect of INGAP-PP upon mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation toward islet cells

期刊

REGULATORY PEPTIDES
卷 153, 期 1-3, 页码 43-48

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.regpep.2008.12.006

关键词

Embryonic stem cells; Differentiation; Insulin-producing cells; INGAP-PP

资金

  1. Fondo Nacional para la Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica
  2. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We evaluated the effect of islet neogenesis-associated protein pentadecapeptide (INGAP-PP) upon islet beta- and non-beta cell differentiation from mouse embryonic stem (mES) cells. ES-D3 cell lines were cultured following Lumelsky's protocol with or without INGAP-PP (5 mu g/ml) at different stages. Gene expression was quantified using qPCR. mES cells were fixed and immunostained using anti insulin-, somatostatin-, glucagon, Pdx-1-, Ngn-3-, Nkx-6.1 and PGP9.5 specific antibodies. PCNA was used to measure replication rate. Bcl(2) (immunostaining) and caspase-3 (enzyme activity and gene expression) were determined as apoptosis markers. INGAP-PP increased IAPP, Glut-2, Kir-6.2, SUR-1 and insulin gene expression, and the percentage of insulin-immunostained cells. Conversely, INGAP-PP reduced significantly glucagon and somatostatin gene expression and immunopositivity. While nestin gene expression was not affected. there was a significant reduction in the percentage of PGP9.5-immunostained cells. Pdx-1 gene expression increased by 115% in INGAP-PP treated cells, as well as the percentage of Pdx-1, Ngn-3 and Nkx-6.1 immunopositive cells. Neither caspase-3 (expression and activity) nor BCl2 Positively immunostained cells were affected by INGAP-PP. Accordingly, INGAP-PP would promote stem cell differentiation into a beta-like cell phenotype. simultaneously decreasing its differentiation toward non-beta-cell precursors. Therefore, INGAP-PP would be potentially useful to obtain beta-cells from stem cells for replacement therapy. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据