4.5 Article

A method for the assessment of time-varying brain shift during navigated epilepsy surgery

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1259-1

关键词

Brain shift; Epilepsy surgery; Frameless stereotaxy; Image-guided neurosurgery; Neuronavigation

资金

  1. ACTIVE project [FP7-ICT-2009-6-270460]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose Image guidance is widely used in neurosurgery. Tracking systems (neuronavigators) allow registering the preoperative image space to the surgical space. The localization accuracy is influenced by technical and clinical factors, such as brain shift. This paper aims at providing quantitative measure of the time-varying brain shift during open epilepsy surgery, and at measuring the pattern of brain deformation with respect to three potentially meaningful parameters: craniotomy area, craniotomy orientation and gravity vector direction in the images reference frame. Methods We integrated an image-guided surgery system with 3D Slicer, an open-source package freely available in the Internet. We identified the preoperative position of several cortical features in the image space of 12 patients, inspecting both the multiplanar and the 3D reconstructions. We subsequently repeatedly tracked their position in the surgical space. Therefore, we measured the cortical shift, following its time-related changes and estimating its correlation with gravity and craniotomy normal directions. Results The mean of the median brain shift amount is 9.64mm (SD = 4.34mm). The brain shift amount resulted not correlated with respect to the gravity direction, the craniotomy normal, the angle between the gravity and the craniotomy normal and the craniotomy area. Conclusions Our method, which relies on cortex surface 3D measurements, gave results, which are consistent with literature. Our measurements are useful for the neurosurgeon, since they provide a continuous monitoring of the intraoperative sinking or bulking of the brain, giving an estimate of the preoperative images validity versus time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据