4.7 Article

Diosgenin-selective molecularly imprinted pearls prepared by wet phase inversion

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 73, 期 9, 页码 1188-1197

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2013.05.014

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymers; Diosgenin; Phase inversion; Acrylic copolymers; MIPs

资金

  1. Executive Unit for Financing the Romanian Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation - UEFISCDI [52-159/2008 BIOENZINIT]
  2. National Authority for Scientific Research of Romania - ANCS [482CB/2011 SIGONAPOL]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functional poly(acrylonitrile-co-acrylic acid) imprinted pearls, selective for diosgenin - a steroidal saponin with the ability to reduce cholesterol from blood - were prepared by wet phase inversion. Three copolymers with the monomer ratios AN:AA90:10, 80:20, and 70:30 where used to prepare the corresponding MIPs (molecularly imprinted polymers) and NIPs (non-imprinted polymers).The rheology studies showed that an 8 w% solution of copolymer in dimethylformamide lead fastest to robust, spherical pearls. Affinity centres were generated via non-covalent bonding between diosgenin's hydroxyl groups and carboxyl moieties of the copolymer matrix. The presence and the quality of the selective binding sites in MIPs were highlighted by optic and electronic microscopy, infrared spectroscopy, thermal analyses, and batch rebinding tests. The imprinting factor (IF) values, ranging from 1.9 to 4.35, decrease with the increasing of the initial concentration of feed solution. When comparing the MIPs concerning the AN:AA ratio, the IF decreases in the order AN:AA80:20 > AN:AA70:30 > AN:AA90:10, suggesting that the 80:20 ratio is the optimum compromise between selectivity (given by AA) and resistance (given by AN). For the best imprinted MIP, 80:20, affinity tests were performed with three competitors, obtaining the average affinity 54%, compared with 31%, 11%, and 4% for the competitors. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据