4.7 Article

Enzyme immobilization on anodic aluminum oxide/polyethyleneimine or polyaniline composites

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 27-32

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.10.009

关键词

polyaniline; polyethyleneimine; anodic aluminum oxide; immobilization; peroxidase; trypsin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) membranes were coated with either polyethyleneimine (PEI) or polyaniline (PANI) and used as supports for enzyme immobilization. The AAO-PEI composite was prepared by cross-flow filtration of the polymer solution through the membrane, whereas AAO-PANI was synthesized using surface chemical polymerization, where MnO2 was used as oxidizing agent for aniline polymerization. After glutaraldehyde activation, horseradish peroxidase and trypsin were immobilized on the composites. The immobilized enzyme activities were determined either in a batch mode or flow-through system. The AAO-PEI-trypsin derivative yielded filtering membrane catalytically active with initial velocities of 2.95 nmol min(-1) and 3.8 nmol min(-1) measured in batch mode and flow-through system (0.46 mL min(-1)), respectively. Furthermore, AAO-PEI-trypsin prepared with membranes of different porosities showed that the enzymatic activity increased as the inside diameter of the pore enlarged. Additionally, it was demonstrated that covalent coupling presents higher activity as compared to attachment by adsorption on a membrane without PEI functionalities, which had 2.9 times less activity. Horseradish peroxidase was successfully immobilized onto the AAO-PANI and retained 74% of its initial activity after five batch cycles and 98% following 24 min under continuous flow. It was also observed by electron microscopy that membrane pores remained unclog after polyaniline coating. Therefore, these results showed the viability of these composites as attractive nano-structured matrices for biotechnological applications. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据