4.7 Article

Poly(vinyl acetal)s containing electron-donor groups: Synthesis in homogeneous phase and their thermal properties

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 39-56

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.10.012

关键词

poly(vinyl alcohol); poly(vinyl acetal)s; 1-naphthaldehyde; 9-anthraldehyde; 9-ethyl-3-carbazolecarboxaldehyde; N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP); thermal degradation; activation energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The condensation reaction of 1-Naphthaldehyde (NA), 9-Anthraldehyde (ANTA), 9-Ethyl-3-carbazolecarboxaldehyde (ECZA) with poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) to give poly(vinyl acetal)s (PVAcs) was studied in detail using N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as solvent for PVA and PVAcs. PVAcs having various degrees of acetalization were obtained. The acetalization reaction under a variety of conditions gave at best a poly[2-(1-naphthyl)-1,3-dioxan-4,6-diylmethylene] (PNA) with 78% acetalization, poly[2-(9-anthryl)-1,3-dioxan-4,6-diylmethylene] (PANTA) with 70% acetalization and poly[2-(9-ethyl-3-carbazolyl)-1,3-dioxan-4,6-diylmethylene] (PECZA) with 48% acetalization. The extent of modification of the polymers was determined by H-1 NMR. PVAcs were characterised by IR spectroscopy and H-1 and C-13 NMR. The glass transition temperatures of PVAcs, determined by DSC, increased linearly as vinyl acetal units increased. Thermal degradation of PVAcs was studied using differential thermal analysis (DTA) and thermogravimetry (TGA) under dynamic conditions in nitrogen. The content of hydroxyl groups had an effect on the thermal stability of PANTAs, the thermal stability of PANTAs decreased as vinyl alcohol units increased. The apparent activation energy of the decomposition was determined by the Kissinger and Flynn-Wall methods which agree well. FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) spectroscopic analysis of the degraded PVAcs showed evidence for elimination of hydroxyl and cyclic acetal groups and the formation of dienes. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据