4.7 Article

Synthesis and properties of novel soluble aromatic polyamides derived from 5-(2-phthalimidyl-3-methyl butanoylamino)isophthalic acid and aromatic diamines

期刊

REACTIVE & FUNCTIONAL POLYMERS
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 91-96

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2007.10.007

关键词

chiral; inherent viscosity; optically active polymers; polycondensation; polyamides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wholly aromatic polyamides are high-performance and attractive materials, but, due to their low solubility, their applications have been restricted. In this work a new class of wholly aromatic and optically active polyamides (PAs) having phthalimide and S-valine pendent groups were prepared by the reaction of 5-(2-phthalimidyl-3-methyl butanoylamino)isophthalic acid (1) as a diacid monomer with various readily available aromatic diamines. Triphenyl phosphite/pyridine in the presence of calcium chloride and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NNIP) were successfully applied for direct polycondensation. The resulting novel polymers were obtained in good yields, inherent viscosities ranging between 0.21 and 0.74 dL g(-1) and were characterized with elemental analysis, FT-IR, H-1 NMR, specific rotation and thermogravimetric analysis techniques. Bulky pendent groups of the polymer chains disturb interchain and intrachain interactions and make these PAs readily soluble in polar, aprotic solvents such as N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimetheylformamide, dimethyl sulfoxide, NMP and solvents such as sulfuric acid. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that the 10% weight loss temperature in a nitrogen atmosphere were more than 320 degrees C, which indicates that the resulting PAs have good thermal satiability as well as excellent solubility. In addition because of existence of chiral center and optical activity of these polymers, they have potential to be used as chiral stationary phase in chromatography technique for the separation of racemic mixtures. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据