4.4 Article

Charge detection mass spectrometry of bacteriophage P22 procapsid distributions above 20 MDa

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 483-488

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.6809

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0832651]
  2. Indiana University Quantitative and Chemical Biology Training Program
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  4. Division Of Chemistry [0832651] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RATIONALECharge state resolution is required to determine the masses of ions in electrospray mass spectrometry, a feat which becomes increasingly difficult as the mass increases. Charge detection mass spectrometry (CDMS) circumvents this limitation by simultaneously measuring the charge and the m/z of individual ions. In this work, we have used electrospray CDMS to determine the number of scaffolding proteins associated with bacteriophage P22 procapsids. METHODSP22 procapsids containing a native cargo of scaffolding protein were assembled in E. coli and purified via differential centrifugation. Electrospray CDMS was used to measure their mass distribution. RESULTSThe procapsid peak was centered at 23.60 MDa, which indicates that they contain an average of similar to 112 scaffolding proteins. The distribution is relatively narrow, less than 31 scaffolding proteins wide. In addition, a peak at 19.84 MDa with a relative abundance of similar to 15% is attributed to empty capsids. Despite having the same sizes in solution, the empty capsid and the procapsid have significantly different average charges. CONCLUSIONSThe detection of empty capsids is unexpected and the process that leads to them is unknown. The average charge on the empty capsids is significantly lower than expected from the charge residue model, which probably indicates that the empty capsids have contracted in the gas phase. The scaffolding protein presumably limits the contraction of the procapsids. This work shows that electrospray CDMS can provide valuable information for masses greater than 20 MDa. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据