4.3 Article

AAV-Mediated Gene Delivery in a Feline Model of Sandhoff Disease Corrects Lysosomal Storage in the Central Nervous System

期刊

ASN NEURO
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1759091415569908

关键词

adeno-associated virus; beta-hexosaminidase; ganglioside; gene therapy; Sandhoff disease

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01-NS064096]
  2. National Tay-Sachs and Allied Diseases Association
  3. Cure Tay-Sachs Foundation
  4. Jewish Community Endowment Fund
  5. Scott-Ritchey Research Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sandhoff disease (SD) is an autosomal recessive neurodegenerative disease caused by a mutation in the gene for the beta-subunit of beta-N-acetylhexosaminidase (Hex), resulting in the inability to catabolize ganglioside GM2 within the lysosomes. SD presents with an accumulation of GM2 and its asialo derivative GA2, primarily in the central nervous system. Myelin-enriched glycolipids, cerebrosides and sulfatides, are also decreased in SD corresponding with dysmyelination. At present, no treatment exists for SD. Previous studies have shown the therapeutic benefit of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector-mediated gene therapy in the treatment of SD in murine and feline models. In this study, we treated presymptomatic SD cats with AAVrh8 vectors expressing feline Hex in the thalamus combined with intracerebroventricular (Thal/ICV) injections. Treated animals showed clearly improved neurologic function and quality of life, manifested in part by prevention or attenuation of whole-body tremors characteristic of untreated animals. Hex activity was significantly elevated, whereas storage of GM2 and GA2 was significantly decreased in tissue samples taken from the cortex, cerebellum, thalamus, and cervical spinal cord. Treatment also increased levels of myelin-enriched cerebrosides and sulfatides in the cortex and thalamus. This study demonstrates the therapeutic potential of AAV for feline SD and suggests a similar potential for human SD patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据