4.4 Article

Tandem mass spectrometric fragmentation behavior of lignans, flavonoids and triterpenoids in Streblus asper

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 28, 期 21, 页码 2363-2370

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7035

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Laboratory for the Chemistry and Molecular Engineering of Medicinal Resources, Ministry of Education of China [CMEMR2012-A21]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2014GXNSFDA118008]
  3. Foundation of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Functional Phytochemicals Research and Utilization [FPRU2011-3]
  4. Fund of Guangxi Pharmaceutical Industry Talent Highland [Guangyirengao [2012] 1202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

RATIONALE: An unambiguous identification of compounds can be achieved by comparison of known fragmentation patterns. While the literature about fragmentation mechanisms of lignans, flavonoids and triterpenoids is few. So the present study analyses the fragmentation mechanisms of these compounds isolated from Streblus asper. METHODSElectrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry (ESI-ITMS) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization ion trap mass spectrometry (APCI-ITMS) were used to obtain the MSn spectra of the compounds. By analyzing the differences between the ions, the fragmentation mechanisms of these compounds were explored. RESULTSOf the 29 compounds detected, 17, 7, and 5 were lignans, flavonoids and triterpenoids, respectively. The majority of lignans were found to give [M - H](-) ions of sufficient abundance for MSn analyses. The flavonoids were prone to the loss of CO and H2O. The triterpenoids always lost one formic acid molecule and two hydrogens, or one H2O from [M - H](-) to form the most abundant product ion in the MSn spectrum. CONCLUSIONSESI/APCI-ITMS were demonstrated to be fast, effective and practical tools to characterize the structures of flavonoids, triterpenoids and lignans. Results of the present study can help identify the analogous constituents by analyzing their MSn spectra. Copyright (c) 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据