4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Targeted quantitative bioanalysis in plasma using liquid chromatography/high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry: an evaluation of global selectivity as a function of mass resolving power and extraction window, with comparison of centroid and profile modes

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 25, 期 19, 页码 2863-2878

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.5178

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is a growing interest in exploring the use of liquid chromatography coupled with full-scan high resolution accurate mass spectrometry (LC/HRMS) in bioanalytical laboratories as an alternative to the current practice of using LC coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS). Therefore, we have investigated the theoretical and practical aspects of LC/HRMS as it relates to the quantitation of drugs in plasma, which is the most commonly used matrix in pharmacokinetics studies. In order to assess the overall selectivity of HRMS, we evaluated the potential interferences from endogenous plasma components by analyzing acetonitrile-precipitated blank human plasma extract using an LC/HRMS system under chromatographic conditions typically used for LC/MS/MS bioanalysis with the acquisition of total ion chromatograms (TICs) using 10 k and 20 k resolving power in both profile and centroid modes. From each TIC, we generated extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of the exact masses of the [M + H](+) ions of 153 model drugs using different mass extraction windows (MEWs) and determined the number of plasma endogenous peaks detected in each EIC. Fewer endogenous peaks are detected using higher resolving power, narrower MEW, and centroid mode. A 20 k resolving power can be considered adequate for the selective determination of drugs in plasma. To achieve desired analyte EIC selectivity and simultaneously avoid missing data points in the analyte EIC peak, the MEW used should not be too wide or too narrow and should be a small fraction of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the profile mass peak. It is recommended that the optimum MEW be established during method development under the specified chromatographic and sample preparation conditions. In general, the optimum MEW, typically <= +/- 20 ppm for 20 k resolving power, is smaller for the profile mode when compared with the centroid mode. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据