4.4 Article

Isotope fractionation factors of N2O diffusion

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 22, 期 17, 页码 2621-2628

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3656

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isotopic signatures of N2O are increasingly used to constrain the total global flux and the relative contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions. Interpretation of isotopic signatures of soil-emitted N2O can be complicated by the isotopic effects of gas diffusion. The aim of our study was to measure the isotopic fractionation factors of diffusion for the isotopologues of N2O and to estimate the potential effect of diffusive fractionation during N2O fluxes from soils using simple simulations. Diffusion experiments were conducted to monitor isotopic signatures of N2O im reservoirs that lost N2O by defined diffusive fluxes. Two different mathematical approaches were used to derive diffusive isotope fractionation factors for O-18 (epsilon(180)), average N-15 (epsilon(bulk)) and N-15 of the central (alpha-) and peripheral (beta-) position within the linear N2O molecule (epsilon(15N alpha,) epsilon(15N beta)). The measured r(180) was -7.79 +/- 0.27 parts per thousand and thus higher than the theoretical value of -8.7 parts per thousand. Conversely, the measured epsilon(bulk) (-5.23 +/- 0.27 parts per thousand) was lower than the theoretical value (-4.4 parts per thousand). The measured site-specific N-15 fractionation factors were not equal, giving a difference between epsilon(15N alpha) and epsilon(15N beta) (epsilon(SP)) of 1.55 +/- 0.28 parts per thousand. Diffusive fluxes of the N2O isotopologues from the soil pore space to the atmosphere were simulated, showing that isotopic signatures of N2O source pools and emitted N2O can be substantially different during periods of non-steady state fluxes. Our results show that diffusive isotope fractionation should be taken into account when interpreting natural abundance isotopic signatures of N2O fluxes from soils. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据