4.7 Review

Recombinant human thyrotropin-aided versus thyroid hormone withdrawal-aided radioiodine treatment for differentiated thyroid cancer after total thyroidectomy: A meta-analysis

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 25-30

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.12.018

关键词

Differentiated thyroid cancer; Recombinant human thyrotropin; Thyroid hormone withdrawal; Remnant ablation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the effects of recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) and thyroid hormone withdrawal (THW) on thyrotropin stimulation prior to remnant ablation of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Material and methods: A comprehensive search was conducted for articles discussing rhTSH and THW prior to December 2012. After applying the inclusion criteria, all the available data were summarized to analyze the efficacy of rhTSH and THW for stimulating TSH. Results: Seven RCTs that involved a total of 1535 patients, were included in the analysis. The ablation rates of the rhTSH group and the THW group were not significantly different (RR = 0.97, 95% Cl: 0.94-1.01, p = 0.1). Patients in the rhTSH group had a better quality of life (QoL) than those in the THW group on the day of ablation (RR = 3.92, 95% Cl: 3.44-5.40, p < 0.00001). However, there was no difference in the QoL 3 months after ablation (RR = 0.9, 95% CI: 2.20-0.39, p = 0.17). Additionally, there were no significant differences in serum thyroglobulin (Tg) levels measured just before radioiodine remnant ablation (preablation thyroglobulin levels) (RR = -0.14, 95% CI: -0.73-0.45, p = 0.65), or in days of hospital isolation (RR = -10.51, 95% CI:-32.79-11.73, p = 0.35) Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the administration of rhTSH had resulted in an ablation rate similar to that of THW for DTC patients, but rhTSH provided a better QoL at the time of ablation. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 110 (2014) 25-30

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据