4.7 Article

Pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of cervical cancers predict chemoradiotherapy outcome

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 107, 期 1, 页码 117-122

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.11.007

关键词

Cervical cancer; Radiotherapy; MRI; Contrast enhancement; Gd-DTPA; Pharmacokinetic analysis; Prediction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess the prognostic value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from pre-chemoradiotherapy dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of cervical cancer patients. Materials and methods: Seventy-eight patients with locally advanced cervical cancer underwent DCE-MRI with Gd-DTPA before chemoradiotherapy. The pharmacokinetic Brix and Tofts models were fitted to contrast enhancement curves in all tumor voxels, providing histograms of several pharmacokinetic parameters (Brix: A(Brix), k(ep), k(ei), Tofts: K-trans, nu(e)). A percentile screening approach including log-rank survival tests was undertaken to identify the clinically most relevant part of the intratumoral parameter distribution. Clinical endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC). Multivariate analysis including FIGO stage and tumor volume was used to assess the prognostic significance of the imaging parameters. Results: A(Brix), k(ei), and K-trans were significantly (P < 0.05) positively associated with both clinical LRC and PFS, while nu(e) was significantly positively correlated with PFS only. k(ep) showed no association with any endpoint. A(Brix) was positively correlated with K-trans and nu(e), and showed the strongest association with endpoint in the log-rank testing. k(ei) and K-trans were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis with LRC as endpoint. Conclusions: Parameters estimated by pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MR images obtained prior to chemoradiotherapy may be used for identifying patients at risk of treatment failure. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据