4.7 Article

Hypoxia imaging with [18F]HX4 PET in NSCLC patients: Defining optimal imaging parameters

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 109, 期 1, 页码 58-64

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.031

关键词

NSCLC; Imaging; Hypoxia; PET; HX4

资金

  1. CTMM framework (AIRFORCE project)
  2. EU 6th and 7th framework program (ART-FORCE and METOXIA program)
  3. Interreg
  4. STW (DuCAT)
  5. Kankeronderzoekfonds Limburg from the Health Foundation Limburg
  6. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF UM 2011-5020, KWF UM 2009-4454, KWF MAC 2011-4970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: [F-18]HX4 is a promising hypoxia PET-tracer. Uptake, spatio-temporal stability and optimal acquisition parameters for [F-18]HX4 PET imaging were evaluated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and methods: [F-18]HX4 PET/CT images of 15 NSCLC patients were acquired 2 h and 4 h after injection (p.i.). Maximum standardized-uptake-value (SUVmax), tumor-to-blood-ratio (TBRmax), hypoxic fraction (HF) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR) were determined for all lesions. To evaluate spatio-temporal stability, DICE-similarity and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated. Optimal acquisition-duration was assessed by comparing 30, 20, 10 and 5 mm acquisitions. Results: Considerable uptake (TBR >1.4) was observed in 18/25 target lesions. TBRmax increased significantly from 2 h (1.6 +/- 0.3) to 4 h p.i. (2.0 +/- 0.6). Uptake patterns at 2 h and 4 h p.i. showed a strong correlation (R = 0.77 +/- 0.10) with a DICE similarity coefficient of 0.69 +/- 0.08 for the 30% highest uptake volume. Reducing acquisition-time resulted in significant changes in SUVmax and CNR. TBRmax and HF were only affected for scan-times of 5 min. Conclusions: The majority of NSCLC lesions showed considerable [F-18]HX4 uptake. The heterogeneous uptake pattern was stable between 2 h and 4 h p.i. [F-18]HX4 PET imaging at 4 h p.i. is superior to 2 h p.i. to reach highest contrast. Acquisition time may be reduced to 10 min without significant effects on TBRmax and HF. (C) 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据