4.7 Article

Phase I trial of the combination of the Akt inhibitor nelfinavir and chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 107, 期 2, 页码 184-188

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.03.023

关键词

Rectal cancer; Chemoradiation; Phase I; Nelfinavir

资金

  1. MAASTRO Cancer Foundation
  2. EU
  3. Dutch Cancer Society [KWF UM 2008-4210, UM 2009-4454]
  4. Interreg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To investigate the toxicity of nelfinavir, administered during preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Material and methods: Twelve patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy to 50.4 Gy combined with capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) BID. Three dose levels (DL) of nelfinavir were tested: 750 mg BID (DL1), 1250 mg BID (DL2) and an intermediate level of 1000 mg BID (DL3). Surgery was performed between 8 and 10 weeks after completion of CRT. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), defined as any grade 3 or higher non-hematological or grade 4 or higher hematological toxicity. Results: Eleven patients could be analyzed: 5 were treated in DL1, 3 in DL2 and 3 in DL3. The first 3 patients in DL1 did not develop a DLT. In DL2 one patient developed gr 3 diarrhea, 1 patient had gr 3 transaminase elevation and 1 patient had a gr 3 cholangitis with unknown cause. An intermediate dose level was tested in DL3. In this group 2 patients developed gr 3 diarrhea and 1 patient gr 3 transaminase elevation and gr 4 post-operative wound complication. Three patients achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Conclusions: Nelfinavir 750 mg BID was defined as the recommended phase II dose in combination with capecitabine and 50.4 Gy pre-operative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. First tumor response evaluations are promising, but a further phase II study is needed to get more information about efficacy of this treatment regimen. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 107 (2013) 184-188

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据