4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Assessing 'radiosensitivity' with kinetic profiles of γ-H2AX, 53BP1 and BRCA1 foci

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 101, 期 1, 页码 35-38

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.065

关键词

Radiosensitivity; BRCA1; H2AX; Foci; Kinetics

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA016042-31, P30 CA016042, CA-16042] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [U19 AI067769, AI067769, P30 AI028697, U19 AI067769-07, AI-28697, P30 AI028697-20] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS052528, NS052528, R01 NS052528-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: DNA repair assays to identify radiosensitive patients have had limited clinical implementation due to long turn-around times or limited specificity. This study evaluates gamma-H2AX-Irradiation Induced Foci (IRIF) kinetics as a more rapid surrogate for the 'gold standard' colony survival assay (GSA) using several known DNA repair disorders as reference models. Materials and methods: Radiosensitive cells of known and unknown etiology were studied. gamma-H2AX-IRIFs were quantified over 24 h, and the curves were fitted by combining logarithmic growth and exponential decay functions. Fitted values that differed from radionormal controls were considered aberrant and compared to CSA results. Results: We observed 87% agreement of IRIF data with the CSA for the 14 samples tested. Analysis of gamma-H2AX-IRIF kinetics for known repair disorders indicated similarities between an RNF168(-/-) cell line and an RS cell of unknown etiology. These cell lines were further characterized by a reduction in BRCA1-IRIF formation and G2/M checkpoint activation. Conclusions: gamma-H2AX-IRIF kinetics showed high concordance with the CSA in RS populations demonstrating its potential as a more rapid surrogate assay. This method provides a means to globally identify defective DNA repair pathways in RS cells of unknown etiology through comparison with known DNA repair defects. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 101 (2011) 35-38

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据