4.7 Article

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 94, 期 1, 页码 47-52

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.11.004

关键词

Cholangiocarcinoma; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; Treatment outcome; Toxicity

资金

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Varian Medical Systems
  3. Palo Alto
  4. Danish Medical Research Council
  5. Lundbeck Foundation Center for Interventional Research in Radiation Oncology (CIRRO)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To report Outcomes of a single institution study of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. The close-volume dependency of the observed gastrointestinal toxicity is explored. Methods and materials: Twenty-seven patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (n = 26 Klatskin tumours and one intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC)) were treated by linac-based SBRT. The dose schedule was 45 Gy in three fractions prescribed to the isocenter. Results: The median progression-free survival and overall Survival were 6.7 and 10.6 months, respectively. With a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 6 patients had severe duodenal/pyloric ulceration and 3 patients developed duodenal stenosis. Duodenal radiation exposure was higher in patients developing moderate to high-grade gastrointestinal toxicity with the difference in mean maximum dose to I cm(3) of duodenum reaching statistical significance. A statistically significant association between grade >= 2 Ulceration and Volume of duodenum exposed to selected dose levels was not established. Conclusion: The outcomes of SBRT for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma appear comparable to conventionally fractionated chemoradiotherapy with or without brachytherapy boost. The practical advantages of SBRT are of particular interest for such poor prognosis patients. Patient selection, however, is key in order to avoid compromising Such practical gains with excessive gastrointestinal toxicity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 94 (2010) 47-52

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据