4.7 Article

Is the Roach formula predictive for biochemical outcome in prostate cancer patients with minimal residual disease undergoing local radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy?

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 94, 期 3, 页码 324-327

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.12.031

关键词

Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Roach formula; Adjuvant radiotherapy; Biochemical recurrence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To find out if the risk of biochemical failure can be predicted applying the risk assessment for lymph-node metastases as suggested by the Roach formula for patients with minimal residual disease after radical prostatectomy undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy. Materials and methods: Patients after radical prostatectomy presenting with pT3-tumours or positive surgical margins, negative nodes and with a post-operative and pre-radiotherapy PSA level <= 0.1 ng/ml and without hormonal therapy were selected. Patients had received local 3D-conformal radiotherapy in the prostatic region with 66-72 Gy. According to the risk stratification of the Roach formula patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 with probability of positive lymph-nodes <15% and Group 2 with >= 15% Biochemical recurrence was defined by reaching a PSA level >= 0.2 ng/ml. Results: A total of 55/288 patients could be identified, 26 patients in Group 1 and 29 patients in Group 2. Mean follow-up was 45 months. Biochemical recurrence free survival after 5 years was 78% for all patients and showed a significant difference between Group 1(100%) and Group 2 with (58%; p = 0.004). Conclusion: The risk for biochemical failure after adjuvant radiotherapy in post-operative patients presenting with minimal residual disease is significantly influenced by the Roach formula. These findings are considered to provide a rationale for the decision on the volume of post-operative radiotherapy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 94 (2010) 324-327

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据