4.7 Review

Genetic variants and normal tissue toxicity after radiotherapy: A systematic review

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 92, 期 3, 页码 299-309

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.06.015

关键词

Genetic variants; Normal tissue toxicity; Radiotherapy

资金

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Danish Medical Research Council
  4. Danish Council for Strategic Research
  5. CIRRO
  6. Lundbeck Foundation Centre for Interventional Research in Radiation Oncology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the last decade, nearly 60 studies have addressed possible associations between various genetic sequence alterations and risk of adverse reactions after radiotherapy. We report here an overview of these studies with information on the genetic variants, turnout type, number of patients included, the endpoint studied, the mechanism(s) by which the candidate genes are involved in the pathogenesis of normal tissue toxicity, and odds ratios (ORs) for candidate variants. Though many positive results have been reported, inconsistent findings and non-replication of previous results have frequently occurred. This can presumably be attributed to certain methodological shortcomings including lack of statistical power to detect small effect sizes. Based on theoretical considerations and experiences from other scientific fields, we discuss how future studies should be designed in order to successfully unravel the genetics of normal tissue radiosensitivity. We propose a model of the allelic architecture that may underlie differences in normal tissue radiosensitivity. Genome wide association studies have proven a powerful tool to identify novel loci that affect various phenotypes. Nonetheless, genome wide association studies are extremely demanding in terms of sample size. Furthermore, certain limitations still relate to this kind of studies, emphasizing the need for international consortia such as the ESTRO GENEPI. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 92 (2009) 299-309

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据