4.7 Review

Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy for pathologic T3 or margin-positive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 1-9

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.04.013

关键词

prostate cancer; adjuvant therapy; radiotherapy; radical prostatectomy; systematic review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: Results following radical prostatectomy (RP) are suboptimal in patients found to have cancer extending beyond the prostatic capsule (pT3) or present at the resection margins (R1). The optimal postoperative management of such patients is undefined. Therapeutic alternatives include adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or active surveillance. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion in this systematic review if they compared adjuvant RT in the immediate period after RP to active surveillance - with therapies held in reserve for salvage - in prostate cancer patients with pT3 or R1 disease or both. The primary outcome of interest was overall survival. Results: Three RCTs representing 1743 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria. Two trials reported data on overall survival; a meta-analysis of the data showed no significant improvement associated with adjuvant RT (hazard ratio = 0.91, 95% CI 0.67-1.22, p = 0.52). All trials reported data on biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS). On meta-analysis, adjuvant RT significantly improved bPFS (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% CI 0.40-0.56, p < 0.00001). One trial provided comparative graded toxicity data; there were no significant differences between arms in severe (>= grade 3) gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity at five years. Conclusions: To date, adjuvant RT has not been shown to improve overall survival compared with active surveillance. Longer follow-up from completed RCTs is required to accurately assess this outcome. Adjuvant RT does, however, significantly improve bPFS and is not associated with excess severe late toxicity. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据