4.7 Article

Integrin-linked kinase: Dispensable for radiation survival of three-dimensionally cultured fibroblasts

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 329-335

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.09.007

关键词

ILK; fibroblasts; three-dimensional cell culture; AKT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Cancer treatment by conventional radiotherapy is limited by normal tissue side-effects. Fibroblasts as nontarget stromal cell type are considered as strong promoter of tumor growth and for developing a therapy resistant phenotype. Regarding application of novel molecular therapeutics combined with radiotherapy, evaluation of a specific targeted molecule in both tumor and normal cells is mandatory for efficacy and tolerability assessment. Previous work showed integrin-linked kinase (ILK), a mediator of P-integrin signals and putative phosphorylator of AKT, as potent anti-survival regulator in human cancer cell lines. Materials and methods: To evaluate the role of ILK in normal fibroblast survival, ILK-wild-type (ILKfl/fl), ILK-/- and ILKN-terminal and ILKc-terminal domain expressing fibroblasts were irradiated with X-rays on different substrata or in threedimensional laminin-rich extracellular matrix (IrECM). Results: On control substrata, ILK-deficient and ILK-mutant fibroblasts showed significant increase in radiation survival relative to ILK-wild-type cells. This effect was compensated by growth on ECM proteins and in 3D IrECM. ILK regulated AKT activity in a phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)-dependent manner. Upon PI3K inhibition, only ILK-wild-type fibroblasts showed significant radiosensitization. Conclusions:These findings obtained in 3D cell cultures suggest ILK to be dispensable for the radiation survival response of normal fibroblasts. However, targeting the PI3K/AKT signaling axis pharmacologically might be critical for survival of normal fibroblasts exposed to ionizing radiation. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据