4.7 Article

Improved Subthalamic Nucleus Depiction with Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 269, 期 1, 页码 216-223

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121991

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01EB013443-01, R01NS072370]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To assess quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the depiction of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) by using 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Materials and Methods: This study was HIPAA compliant and institutional review board approved. Ten healthy subjects (five men, five women; mean age, 24 years 6 3 [standard deviation]; age range, 21-33 years) and eight patients with Parkinson disease (five men, three women; mean age, 57 years 6 14; age range, 25-69 years) who were referred by neurologists for preoperative navigation MR imaging prior to deep brain stimulator placement were included in this study. T2-weighted (T2w), T2*-weighted (T2*w), R2* mapping (R2*), phase, susceptibility-weighted (SW), and QSM images were reconstructed for STN depiction. Qualitative visualization scores of STN and internal globus pallidus (GPi) were recorded by two neuroradiologists on all images. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the STN and GPi were also measured. Measurement differences were assessed by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and the signed rank test. Results: Qualitative scores were significantly higher on QSM images than on T2w, T2*w, R2*, phase, or SW images (P < .05) for STN and GPi visualization. Median CNR was 6.4 and 10.7 times higher on QSM images than on T2w images for differentiation of STN from the zona incerta and substantia nigra, respectively, and was 22.7 and 9.1 times higher on QSM images than on T2w images for differentiation of GPi from the internal capsule and external globus pallidus, respectively. CNR differences between QSM images and all other images were significant (P < .01). Conclusion: QSM at 3-T MR imaging performs significantly better than current standard-of-care sequences in the depiction of the STN. (C) RSNA, 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据