4.7 Article

Late Stage Complicated Atheroma in Low-Grade Stenotic Carotid Disease: MR Imaging Depiction-Prevalence and Risk Factors

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 260, 期 3, 页码 841-847

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11101652

关键词

-

资金

  1. RSNA Research and Education Foundation
  2. Department of Medical Imaging (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine if complicated plaque can be found by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-depicted intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), even among symptomatic patients with low-grade (<= 50%) carotid stenosis. Materials and Methods: The institutional ethics review board approved this retrospective study and waived requirements for written informed consent. Symptomatic patients with bilateral 0%-50% carotid stenosis referred for carotid MR imaging were considered. Risk factors (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, smoking, coronary artery disease, and cerebrovascular disease), medications (antihypertensive drugs, diabetes drugs, statins, and aspirin), and the brain side causing symptoms were recorded. MR-depicted IPH prevalence in the carotid arteries ipsilateral and contralateral to the symptomatic side was compared by using the Fisher exact test. Multivariable regression was used to compare the MR-depicted IPH prevalence, while adjusting for risk factors and medications. Results: A total of 217 patients (434 carotid arteries) were included. MR-depicted IPH was found in 13% (31 of 233) of carotid arteries ipsilateral and 7% (14 of 201) of arteries contralateral to symptoms (P< .05). Male sex (P < .05) and increasing age (P,.05) were associated with MR-depicted IPH after controlling for risk factors and medications. Conclusion: Complicated carotid atheroma can be found among symptomatic patients with low-grade (<= 50%) stenosis, and this is associated with male sex and increasing age. MR-depicted IPH may be useful to stratify risk for patients with low-grade carotid stenosis. (C) RSNA, 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据