4.7 Article

H1N1 Influenza: Initial Chest Radiographic Findings in Helping Predict Patient Outcome

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 255, 期 1, 页码 252-259

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10092240

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate whether findings on initial chest radiographs of influenza A (H1N1) patients can help predict clinical outcome. Materials and Methods: Institutional review board approval was obtained; informed consent was waived. All adult patients admitted to the emergency department (May to September 2009) with a confirmed diagnosis of H1N1 influenza who underwent frontal chest radiography within 24 hours were included. Radiologic findings were characterized by type and pattern of opacities and zonal distribution. Major adverse outcome measures were mechanical ventilation and death. Results: Of 179 H1N1 influenza patients, 97 (54%) underwent chest radiography at admission; 39 (40%) of these had abnormal radiologic findings likely related to influenza infection and five (13%) of these 39 had adverse outcomes. Fifty-eight (60%) of 97 patients had normal radiographs; two (3%) of these had adverse outcomes (P = .113). Characteristic imaging findings included the following: ground-glass (69%), consolidation (59%), frequently patchy (41%), and nodular (28%) opacities. Bilateral opacities were common (62%), with involvement of multiple lung zones (72%). Findings in four or more zones and bilateral peripheral distribution occurred with significantly higher frequency in patients with adverse outcomes compared with patients with good outcomes (multizonal opacities: 60% vs 6%, P = .01; bilateral peripheral opacities: 60% vs 15%, P = .049). Conclusion: Extensive involvement of both lungs, evidenced by the presence of multizonal and bilateral peripheral opacities, is associated with adverse prognosis. Initial chest radiography may have significance in helping predict clinical outcome but normal initial radiographs cannot exclude adverse outcome. (C) RSNA, 2010

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据