4.5 Article

Informatics in Radiology Sliding-Thin-Slab Averaging for Improved Depiction of Low-Contrast Lesions with Radiation Dose Savings at Thin-Section CT

期刊

RADIOGRAPHICS
卷 30, 期 2, 页码 317-326

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/rg.302096007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Current multidetector computed tomography (CT) scanners allow volumetric data acquisition with thin-section collimations and overlapping section reconstructions. The resultant nearly isotropic data sets help minimize partial-volume averaging effects and are ideal for two- and three-dimensional postprocessing and software-assisted lesion detection and quantification. However, the section thickness, image noise, and radiation dose are closely related, and when one parameter must be altered to suit the clinical setting, the others may be affected. When the clinical purpose demands both high spatial resolution and low image noise (eg, for the detection of hypoattenuating lesions in organs such as the kidneys and liver), the necessary trade-off-an increase in the radiation dose to the patient-may be unacceptable. The application of a sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm during image postprocessing and review helps overcome this limitation by reconstructing thicker sections with lower noise levels from thin-section data obtained with dose-saving protocols. In principle, a high noise level is acceptable in the initial reconstruction of the CT volume data set. During image review at the workstation, the section thickness can be interactively increased to minimize image noise and improve lesion detectability. The combination of thin-section scanning with thick-section display allows routine volumetric imaging without a general increase in radiation dose or a reduction in the detectability of low-contrast lesions. Supplemental material available at http://radiographics.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/rg.302096007/-/DC1.c (C)RSNA, 2010.radiographics.rsna.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据