4.4 Article

Filgrastim Improves Survival in Lethally Irradiated Nonhuman Primates

期刊

RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 179, 期 1, 页码 89-100

出版社

RADIATION RESEARCH SOC
DOI: 10.1667/RR3049.1

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID [HHSN266200500043C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Farese, A. M., Cohen, M. V., Katz, B. P., Smith, C. P., Gibbs, A., Cohen, D. M. and MacVittie, T. J. Filgrastim Improves Survival in Lethally Irradiated Nonhuman Primates. Radiat. Res. 179, 89-100 (2013). Treatment of individuals exposed to potentially lethal doses of radiation is of paramount concern to health professionals and government agencies. We evaluated the efficacy of filgrastim to increase survival of nonhuman primates (NHP) exposed to an approximate mid-lethal dose (LD50/60) (7.50 Gy) of LINAC-derived photon radiation. Prior to total-body irradiation (TBI), nonhuman primates were randomized to either a control (n = 22) or filgrastim-treated (n = 24) cohorts. Filgrastim (10 mu g/kg/d) was administered beginning 1 day after TBI and continued daily until the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was >1,000/mu L for 3 consecutive days. All nonhuman primates received medical management as per protocol. The primary end point was all cause overall mortality over the 60 day in-life study. Secondary end points included mean survival time of decedents and all hematologic-related parameters. Filgrastim significantly (P < 0.004) reduced 60 day overall mortality [20.8% (5/24)] compared to the controls [59.1% (13/22)]. Filgrastim significantly decreased the duration of neutropenia, but did not affect the absolute neutrophil count nadir. Febrile neutropenia (ANC <500/mu L and body temperature >= 103 degrees F) was experienced by 90.9% (20/22) of controls compared to 79.2% (19/24) of filgrastim-treated animals (P = 0.418). Survival was significantly increased by 38.3% over controls. Filgrastim, administered at this dose and schedule, effectively mitigated the lethality of the hematopoietic subsyndrome of the acute radiation syndrome. (C) 2013 by Radiation Research Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据