4.4 Article

A Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (SOD2)-Mediated Adaptive Response

期刊

RADIATION RESEARCH
卷 179, 期 2, 页码 115-124

出版社

RADIATION RESEARCH SOC
DOI: 10.1667/RR3126.2

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE [DE-SC0001271]
  2. NIH NCI [R01-CA132998, R01-CA111423]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0001271] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Very low doses of ionizing radiation, 5 to 100 mGy, can induce adaptive responses characterized by elevation in cell survival and reduction in micronuclei formation. Utilizing these end points, RKO human colon carcinoma and transformed mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEF), wild-type or knockout cells missing TNF receptors 1 and 2 (TNFR1(-)R2(-)), and C57BL/6 and TNFR1(-)R2(-) knockout mice, we demonstrate that intact TNF signaling is required for induction of elevated manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) activity (P < 0.001) and the subsequent expression of these SOD2-mediated adaptive responses when cells are challenged at a later time with 2 Gy. In contrast, amifostine's free thiol form WR1065 can directly activate NF-kappa B giving rise to elevated SOD2 activity 24 h later and induce an adaptive response in both MEF wild-type and TNF signaling defective TNFR1(-)R2(-) cells. Transfection of cells with SOD2 siRNA completely abolishes both the elevation in SOD2 activity and expression of the adaptive responses. These results were confirmed in vivo using a micronucleus assay in splenocytes derived from C57BL/6 and TNFR1(-)R2(-) knockout mice that were exposed to 100 mGy or 400 mg/kg amifostine 24 h prior to exposure to a 2 Gy whole-body dose. A dose of 100 mGy also conferred enhanced protection to C57BL/6 mice exposed 24 h later to 100 mg/kg of N-Ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). While very low radiation doses require an intact TNF signaling process to induce a SOD2-mediated adaptive response, amifostine can induce a similar adaptive response in both TNF receptor competent and knockout cells, respectively. (C) 2013 by Radiation Research Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据